Overkill !

January 7, 2011

From the NZ Herald online….

Sheridyn Rawlins and Chris Graham with their daughter Brooklyn.

Armed police stopped a man, his pregnant wife and 3-year-old daughter after reports that he was waving a gun at passing cars.

Chris Graham, 28, has been charged with unlawfully carrying an imitation firearm and appeared in the Waitakere District Court yesterday. He pleaded not guilty.

He told the Herald that he had been playing a game with his 3-year-old daughter, Brooklyn, and police had made a mistake.

But police say they had a call from a neighbour saying a man was pointing a firearm at other people.

Graham said he was chasing his daughter with a broken paintball gun and she was chasing him with a water pistol on Tuesday evening.

About an hour later the family all got into the car to go out for dinner. His wife, Sheridyn Rawlins, was driving and he was in the back seat with his daughter, he said.

They pulled out of their Te Atatu South property and saw a police car in the middle of the road. Armed police officers were in the surrounding houses.

“The cops were screaming ‘stop the vehicle’ … there was another guy screaming ‘I’ve got a clear shot’,” Graham said.

Ms Rawlins said she was not sure if the police were talking to them but she stopped the car and got out.

She said one police officer told her: “I need to take you around the corner because they might shoot him.”

Graham said he unbuckled Brooklyn before he was told to put his hands out the window and then to get out. He said he was yelled at when he brought his hand back inside to open the car door.

He said the police found the paintball gun on the veranda where he had left it and he was handcuffed and taken to the police station.

Waitakere area commander Inspector Gary Davey said police got a call from a neighbour of Graham who saw a man waving a gun around, shooting at a passing car and pointing it at other people. Mr Davey said police stopped the car because they feared Graham could have had a gun.

He said if people carry toys that look like real guns then they run the risk of being at the centre of an armed police callout.

“This happens [a lot] – generally it is black or silver water pistols but no one knows if they are real or not. Police have to take all reported firearms incidents seriously.”

Mr Davey said Graham would be able to tell his side of the story in court.

Graham described the charges as an “inconvenience” but said his boss has been understanding.

Ms Rawlins said the police could have knocked on the door.

“It was very distressing for a pregnant lady and a 3-year-old child.”


Ninja Nazis?

This response by the Police has got me lost for words, mainly expletives.
Do we have to hear another load of hang wringing bullshit from these dimwit Rambo’s if a trigger happy c**t let loose and killed Chris Graham?
It is a pity Sheridyn didn’t fuck with their heads and stand in between the cops and her husband, saying ” If you are going to shoot me, aim for my unborn child”.
And what about the dick head who told Graham to get out of his car, then gets all trigger happy when he puts his hand down to the door handle!

What is with all this ‘member’ phraseology, ‘member of Police’, ‘member of public’, ‘gang member’? Sounds too penile for my liking, it is a Freudian slip.

Back on the subject, I have noticed a definite paramilitary culture shift by the morons in blue. Did this young family have to hear TV cop show drivel like “I’ve got a clear shot” and be told intimidating shit like “I need to take you around the corner because they might shoot him.” Obviously these wankers have learnt nothing from their terror raid fiasco in Ruatoki.

I think the Graham family has a bigger case against the Police for excessive response.

The NZ Police have an image problem. Haven’t you noticed their impeccable sense of timing when people bolt in cars and have fatal crashes? The Police always break of the chase 20-30 seconds before the crash. I don’t mind if they fatally run some arsehole in a stolen car into a power pole, that is the job and a fair punishment for an arsehole who just cause somebody a whole lot of grief over their car being stolen. But don’t lie and devolve yourselves from the crash.


The Criminal Proceeds Recovery Act

October 11, 2009

Crown Emblem alt

Back in April 09 a torpedo was fired at Civil rights in NZ with the passing into law of The Criminal Proceeds Recovery Act.
I am astounded this took place without a whisper from the media.

Annette King, a Labour Government Minister of Justice in the previous term of Government, wrote this act.
Annette King is a former dental nurse who claimed water Fluoridation and Mercury based fillings to be safe.
Annette King conjures up ill-conceived legislation without reference to good reason as evidenced by her attempt to mass medicate New Zealanders with Folic acid added to bread.

It is interesting to read of an American lady Politician who was behind a similar seizure law in the states. She wanted to ‘hang em high’ … all the low life crims dealing drugs etc. But, and a big but ! … her son got busted for felony possession of Cannabis, he was dealing out of her home.
Guess what? Her home became proceeds of crime forfeiture.
Suddenly she was championing against the law, quoting it breech of civil rights. Shame the silly bitch didn’t realise this before she help draft the law.

The same can be said of Annette King, who had a lot of Pigs squealing in her ear for Third Reich Powers.


The Criminal Proceeds Recovery Act will come into force 1 Dec 09.

The act’s section 3 allows the Police to apply to the High Courts of NZ in a civil action to confiscate a person’s property if they are suspected of a crime involving acquisition of assets and money relating to a crime punishable of a 5 year term in jail or greater.
The Act allows Police to conduct civil action even if the person’s case is thrown out of the Criminal Courts.
This effectively means that Police are now making judicial determinations based upon hearsay evidence they have gathered.
Effectively Judge, Jury and executioner in one malicious package.

This Act makes a flawed assumption that Police function within the rules of fair play, in other words that they do not fabricate evidence, or embellish evidence.
The High Courts will make decisions on these applications using the weight of probability evidence rule as used in the Family Courts (i.e. Rubber stamp).
And we all know how many abuses of natural justice have taken place in the Family Courts System of NZ, because that rule is based upon opinion, not hard evidence.

Therefore it will merely suffice to make allegations without real proof to asset strip NZ citizens.
The respondent in such cases is essentially now considered guilty by accusation, guilty until proven innocent.
The onus of proof is now upon the respondent who will have to foot a hefty legal bill to prove their innocence.

What is insidious is .. the Police (Crown) has an open ended legal budget, the respondent does not, so the inevitable outcome will be singular, the respondent will be bankrupted, either they are guilty, or they spend their assets defending the allegations.
Heads the Police win, tails the respondent loses.
And that is an unethical breech of human rights according to my sense of fair play.
It will be a field day for lawyers defending civil actions, no legal aid, just send the bill to the official assignee.
Annette King must have read up on the Spanish Inquisition to get her inspiration for creating this terrible injustice.

I thought the existing Proceeds of Crime Act was bad enough, and I remind you that back in the day, the Politicians promoted that Act as a cure for white-collar criminals after the 1987 share market debacle, the act has been focused primarily on Cannabis Growing.
The White-collar rich people have clever accountants and lawyers so the Police leave them alone.

To the Fuckwits that cry “Oh the Gangs and Meth, blah blah.. justifies this law”, I say wake up because this new law is non-selective about so called groups of people.

The Police will come after your Grandparent growing a bit more pain killer than they need, far more eagerly than they will chase down gang members.

The Police have a history of victimising innocent people with the existing Proceeds of Crime Act.
It is a fact they staged the first test case of a Hawkes Bay farmer who took over ownership of a farm after cannabis was planted on the property, the growers were seen by witnesses who could verify the farmer was not responsible, the growers had been using the property to grow for some time.
But that didn’t stop the ‘Bastards in Blue’ from telling lies in Court to asset strip the Farmer.
The poor bugger had purchased the property with a first division lotto win for fucks sake!
A more recent case saw a Coromandel Farmer jailed and asset stripped based upon nothing more than a desire to get a result because they spent up large on surveillance.

So now we introduce this latest Act allow the Police virtually unrestrained power to asset strip property.

Justice is blind and truth is the last thing to enter court.